Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan (AI): Perspektif Relasi Manusia–Teknologi Jacques Ellul dan Don Ihde

Penulis

  • Adrianus Yohanes Mai Universitas Gadjah Mada, Fakultas Filsafat, Indonesia
  • M. Mukhtasar Syamsuddin Universitas Gadjah Mada, Fakultas Filsafat, Indonesia
  • Abdul Rokhmat Sairah Z Universitas Gadjah Mada, Fakultas Filsafat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.1778

Kata Kunci:

Ellul, Ihde, Kecerdasan Buatan, Kurikulum, Pendidikan, Relasi Manusia–Teknologi

Abstrak

Transformasi digital dalam pendidikan telah menggeser peran kecerdasan buatan (AI) dari sekadar alat bantu pedagogis menjadi struktur epistemik yang turut membentuk cara pengetahuan dikonstruksi, divalidasi, dan dievaluasi. Artikel ini mengkaji relasi manusia–teknologi dalam kurikulum berbasis AI melalui dialog pemikiran Jacques Ellul dan Don Ihde. Ellul digunakan untuk membaca dominasi logika teknis (la technique) yang cenderung menghasilkan standardisasi dan reduksi pedagogis, sedangkan Ihde menawarkan kerangka postfenomenologi untuk memahami teknologi sebagai mediator relasional yang bersifat multistabil. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui studi pustaka kritis dan analisis hermeneutis terhadap karya primer kedua filsuf serta literatur kontemporer mengenai AI dalam pendidikan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kurikulum berbasis AI berpotensi menggeser pendidikan dari proses pembentukan subjek reflektif menjadi sistem optimasi performa berbasis data yang menekankan keterukuran. Namun, relasi manusia–teknologi yang bersifat mediatif juga membuka kemungkinan desain kurikulum yang lebih reflektif, kritis, dan kontekstual. Berdasarkan sintesis kedua perspektif tersebut, artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa kurikulum berbasis AI perlu dipahami sebagai desain relasi epistemik, bukan sekadar integrasi teknologi. Oleh karena itu, pendidikan perlu mengembangkan literasi AI kritis, kesadaran mediasi teknologi, dan agensi pedagogis manusia sebagai kompetensi inti dalam menghadapi era kecerdasan buatan.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

G. Cooper, “Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 32, pp. 444–452, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y.

S. Sackstein, M. Matthee, and L. Weilbach, “Theories and Models Employed to Understand the Use of Technology in Education: A Hermeneutic Literature Review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, pp. 5041–5081, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11345-5.

J. Aagaard, “Magnetic and multistable: reinterpreting the affordances of educational technology,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 15, pp. 1–10, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s41239-017-0088-4.

Y. Qian, “Pedagogical Applications of Generative AI in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Field,” TechTrends, vol. 69, pp. 1105–1120, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1.

O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur, “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.

H. Crompton and D. Burke, “Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8.

F. A. Sihaloho and Z. Napitupulu, “Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) dalam Dunia Pendidikan di Indonesia: Tinjauan Literatur,” Rekognisi J. Pendidik. dan Kependidikan, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 13–20, 2024.

I. B, A. N. Thamrin, and A. Milani, “Implementasi Etika Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) dalam Sistem Pendidikan dan Analisis Pembelajaran di Indonesia,” Digit. Transform. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 714–723, 2024, doi: 10.47709/digitech.v4i1.4512.

Devi Haryanti Oktavia and Giri Suseno, “Pemanfaatan Kecerdasan Buatan Dalam Pendidikan Di Indonesia: Potensi Dan Tantangan,” Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals J. , vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1680–1686, 2024.

V. Zagkotas, “Artificial Intelligence and the Didactic Transposition of Knowledge: Implications for Curriculum Development and Knowledge Gatekeeping,” Futur. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 44–66, 2025, doi: 10.57125/fed.2025.06.25.03.

B. Memarian and T. Doleck, “Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics (FATE) in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, p. 100152, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100152.

R. Suharyo, S., Subyantoro, S., & Pristiwati, “Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Konteks Kurikulum Merdeka pada Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah: Membangun Keterampilan Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045,” HUMANIKA, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 208–217, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.v30i2.60563.

Z. Bahroun, C. Anane, V. Ahmed, and A. Zacca, “Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis,” Sustainability, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151712983.

J. Ellul, The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books, 1964.

D. Ihde, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. in A Midland book. Indiana University Press, 1990. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=qGx-_VpaJKUC

W. Strielkowski, V. Grebennikova, A. Lisovskiy, G. Rakhimova, and T. Vasileva, “AI?driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation,” Sustain. Dev., vol. 33, pp. 1921–1947, 2025, doi: 10.1002/sd.3221.

R. Ejjami, “The Future of Learning: AI-Based Curriculum Development,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–31, 2024, doi: 10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.24441.

J. Ellul, The Technological System. New York: The Continuum Publishing Corporation, 1980.

A. Lovasz, “Niklas Luhmann and Jacques Ellul on the autonomy of technology,” Kybernetes, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 3896–3918, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1108/K-02-2023-0287.

J. Hanks, E. K. Hanks, and C. Hanks, “From Technological Autonomy to Technological Bluff: Jacques Ellul and Our Technological Condition,” Hum. Aff., vol. 25, pp. 460–470, 2015, doi: 10.1515/humaff-2015-0037.

F. Ono, “Towards a philosophy of education built on fragile parts: Technological rationality and knowledge of pathos,” Educ. Philos. Theory, vol. 56, pp. 182–191, 2022, doi: 10.1080/00131857.2022.2094247.

K. Ahmad et al., “Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Comprehensive Review,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 17, pp. 12–31, 2024, doi: 10.1109/tlt.2023.3314610.

R. Hess, “Can an AI-Powered Tutor Produce Meaningful Results?,” Education Week. Accessed: Jun. 05, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.edweek.org/technology/opinion-can-an-ai-powered-tutor-produce-meaningful-results/2025/07

J. Bailey and J. Warner, “AI Tutors: Hype or Hope for Education?,” Educ. Next, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 62–71, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://www.educationnext.org/ai-tutors-hype-or-hope-for-education-forum/

Kemendikdasmen, Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia Nomor 021/Kep/Mendikdasmen/2025 tentang Pembelajaran Koding dan Kecerdasan Artifisial pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Negara Republik Indonesia, 2024.

M. Chawaremera, “Algorithmic Teaching, Fading Thought? Rethinking Engagement in the AI Era,” Int. Conf. Educ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2025, doi: 10.34190/icer.2.1.4008.

X. W. Xu, “AI optimization algorithms enhance higher education management and personalized teaching through empirical analysis,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94481-5.

Oseremi Onesi-Ozigagun, Yinka James Ololade, Nsisong Louis Eyo-Udo, and Damilola Oluwaseun Ogundipe, “Revolutionizing Education Through Ai: a Comprehensive Review of Enhancing Learning Experiences,” Int. J. Appl. Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 589–607, 2024, doi: 10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1011.

W. Cao, Nhu Tam Mai, and W. Guo, “Personalized Learning and Adaptive Systems: AI-Driven Educational Innovation and Student Outcome Enhancement,” Int. J. Educ. Humanit., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 173–182, 2025, doi: 10.54097/tc5k6825.

R. S. Baker and A. Hawn, “Algorithmic Bias in Education,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1052–1092, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9.

Obed Boateng and Bright Boateng, “Algorithmic bias in educational systems: Examining the impact of AI-driven decision making in modern education,” World J. Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 2012–2017, 2025, doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.0253.

Farhatin, “Kesenjangan akses pendidikan digital di daerah 3T (tertinggal, terdepan, dan terluar),” Maliki Interdiscip. J. eISSN, vol. 3, pp. 1494–1502, 2025, [Online]. Available: http://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/mij/index

D. Ihde, Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993.

K. W. Yau, C. Chai, T. Chiu, H. Meng, I. King, and Y. Yam, “A phenomenographic approach on teacher conceptions of teaching Artificial Intelligence (AI) in K-12 schools,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, pp. 1041–1064, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11161-x.

K. Turvey and N. Pachler, “A topological exploration of convergence/divergence of human-mediated and algorithmically mediated pedagogy,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 619–638, May 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.70007.

A. Mouta, E. M. Torrecilla-Sánchez, and A. Pinto-Llorente, “Comprehensive professional learning for teacher agency in addressing ethical challenges of AIED: Insights from educational design research,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, pp. 3343–3387, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12946-y.

H. Vartiainen, J. Kahila, M. Tedre, S. López-Pernas, and N. Pope, “Enhancing children’s understanding of algorithmic biases in and with text-to-image generative AI,” New Media Soc., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 5342–5368, 2025, doi: 10.1177/14614448241252820.

S. F. Ahmad et al., “Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 311, 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01787-8.

G. Wellner and I. Levin, “Ihde meets Papert: combining postphenomenology and constructionism for a future agenda of philosophy of education in the era of digital technologies,” Learn. Media Technol., vol. 49, pp. 656–669, 2023, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2023.2251388.

dan T. R. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, “Mengembangkan Bangkit 2024 dengan Penambahan Kurikulum AI,” Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi. [Online]. Available: https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/news/article/mengembangkan-bangkit-2024-dengan-penambahan-kurikulum-ai/

A. Okada, T. Sherborne, G. Panselinas, and G. Kolionis, “Fostering Transversal Skills Through Open Schooling Supported by the CARE-KNOW-DO Pedagogical Model and the UNESCO AI Competencies Framework,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 35, pp. 1953–1998, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40593-025-00458-w.

C. Leon, J. Lipuma, and X. Oviedo-Torres, “Artificial intelligence in STEM education: a transdisciplinary framework for engagement and innovation,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1619888.

D. Ihde, “The Experience of Technology: Human-Machine Relations,” Philos. Soc. Crit., vol. 2, pp. 267–279, 1975, doi: 10.1177/019145377500200304.

B. Díaz and M. Nussbaum, “Artificial intelligence for teaching and learning in schools: The need for pedagogical intelligence,” Comput. Educ., vol. 217, p. 105071, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105071.

K. Conrad and S. Kamperman, “Building Critical AI Literacy: An Approach to Generative AI,” Threshold. Educ., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 142–158, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://academyforeducationalstudies.org/journals/thresholds/thresholds-current-issues/volume-48-issue-2-summer-2025/

F. Putri, “Kurikulum Nasional Tahun Ajaran 2025/2026: Arah Baru Pendidikan Indonesia,” Kelas Juara. [Online]. Available: https://kelasjuara.id/kurikulum-nasional/

Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture; Finnish National Agency for Education, “AI Recommendations for Education: First Part for Consultation,” Finland, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/projects-and-legislation/project?tunnus=OKM021:00/2024

H. I. Rohman et al., “Disrupsi Teknologi dalam Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia: Studi Literatur tentang Bagaimana Artificial Intelligence Mengubah Lanskap Pembelajaran,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 20282–20290, 2025.

M. Popow, “Decolonizing knowledge in the postdigital era: Pedagogical strategies for navigating AI-driven epistemic transformations,” Educ. Philos. Theory, vol. 58, pp. 44–56, 2025, doi: 10.1080/00131857.2025.2552764.

B. Jose, A. Cleetus, B. Joseph, L. Joseph, B. Jose, and A. K. John, “Epistemic authority and generative AI in learning spaces: rethinking knowledge in the algorithmic age,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, pp. 1–4, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1647687.

K. Khairunnisa, H. Huriyah, and M. Mahmudah, “Adaptive learning design based on local wisdom texts in Indonesian language classes: A literature review,” Proceeding Int. Conf. Islam. Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1213, 2025, doi: 10.18860/icied.v10i1.3768.

& K. Melinda, Febriyana, “Tarbiatuna: Journal of Islamic Education Studies,” Tarbiatuna J. Islam. Educ. Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 52–63, 2023.

K. Sperling, C.-J. Stenberg, C. McGrath, A. Åkerfeldt, F. Heintz, and L. Stenliden, “In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 6, p. 100169, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169.

Fadya Mardhiyyah, C. Darmawan, and A. Mahpudz, “Profil Pelajar Pancasila dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan,” J. Ilm. Mimb. Demokr., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 299–306, 2023, doi: 10.21009/jimd.v23i1.37082.

Prihantoro, “Journal of Deep Learning,” J. Deep Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–24, 2025.

F. Feriyanto and D. Anjariyah, “Deep Learning Approach Through Meaningful, Mindful, and Joyful Learning: A Library Research,” Electron. J. Educ. Soc. Econ. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 208–212, 2024, doi: 10.33122/ejeset.v5i2.321.

S. W. McPhee and M. Jerowsky, “Beyond technical skills: a pedagogical perspective on fostering critical engagement with generative AI in university classrooms,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, no. September, pp. 1–7, 2025, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1593278.

Y. R. Langoday, N. Nurrahma, and S. Rijal, “Policy Reflection: Kurikulum Merdeka as Educational Innovation in the Era of Society 5.0,” Edunesia J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 957–978, 2024, doi: 10.51276/edu.v5i2.915.

N. Agusdianita, Dalifa, I. Supriatna, R. D. S. M. Izzania, and Yusnia, “Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Pada Kurikulum Merdeka,” Badranaya J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2025, doi: 10.31980/badranaya.v3i1.2354.

S. M. Dalimunthe, M. H. Rambe, and N. Dwinta, “Solusi Krisis Pendidikan Di Daerah 3T: Pendekatan Dan Inovasi Untuk Kemajuan,” El Banar J. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2025, doi: 10.54125/elbanar.v8i1.503.

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2026-07-05

Cara Mengutip

Mai, A. Y., Syamsuddin, M. M. ., & Sairah Z, A. R. (2026). Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis Kecerdasan Buatan (AI): Perspektif Relasi Manusia–Teknologi Jacques Ellul dan Don Ihde. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 6(6), 1049-1060. https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.1778