Modal Intelektual, Kebijakan, dan Pendanaan Sebagai Determinan Keyakinan Civitas Akademika Terhadap Visi Universitas Technopreneur: Analisis PLS-SEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.1476Keywords:
Kebijakan Kelembagaan, Modal Intelektual, Transparansi Pendanaan, Universitas TeknopreneurialAbstract
Transformasi perguruan tinggi menjadi Technopreneurial University merupakan agenda strategis nasional, namun implementasinya sering terhambat oleh rendahnya keyakinan kolektif civitas akademika. Di Universitas IVET, meskipun berbagai inisiatif telah dikembangkan, survei awal menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas responden masih ragu terhadap ketercapaian visi technopreneur. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Intellectual Capital, Kebijakan Pendukung Technopreneur, dan Ketersediaan Pendanaan terhadap Keyakinan Civitas Akademika dalam mewujudkan visi tersebut. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif eksplanatori dengan desain survei cross-sectional terhadap 112 responden civitas akademika Universitas IVET. Instrumen berupa kuesioner skala Likert 5 poin diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya, lalu dianalisis menggunakan Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Hasil menunjukkan bahwa Transparansi & Kelangsungan pendanaan merupakan prediktor dominan terhadap keyakinan (? = 0.579, f² = 0.672), sementara Regulasi Internal justru berpengaruh negatif; selain itu, efek positif transparansi pendanaan diperkuat oleh keselarasan kurikulum, tetapi dilemahkan oleh tekanan normatif yang tidak diikuti dukungan operasional. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa keyakinan kolektif dibentuk bukan oleh kebijakan simbolis, melainkan oleh integrasi sistemik antara pendanaan transparan, kurikulum nyata, dan dukungan substantif. Kontribusi penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi empat teori besar dalam satu model empiris dan penerapan PLS-SEM untuk mengungkap dinamika keyakinan dalam konteks transformasi universitas di Indonesia.
Downloads
References
H. Wijayanto Aripradono, I. Nursyamsi, A. Wahab, and Z. Sultan, “Educational Technology for Digital Transformation of Higher Education Institutions into Entrepreneurial Universities,” Policy Gov. Rev., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 303, 2024, doi: 10.30589/pgr.v8i3.1019.
M. Menter, “From technological to social innovation: toward a mission-reorientation of entrepreneurial universities,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 104–118, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10961-023-10002-4.
D. Lyken-Segosebe, B. Montshiwa, S. Kenewang, and T. Mogotsi, “Stimulating academic entrepreneurship through technology business incubation: Lessons for the incoming sponsoring university,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n5p1.
A. I. Nor, F. S. Mohamed, M. M. Barre, and M. A. Hussein, “The role of higher education institutions in promoting entrepreneurship development,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, p., 2025, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2523417.
D. A. Loorbach and J. Wittmayer, “Transforming universities: Mobilizing research and education for sustainability transitions at Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands,” Sustain. Sci., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 19–33, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11625-023-01335-y.
S. Issar and M. Dilling, Analyzing Failed Institutional Change Attempts, vol. 75, no. 1. 2022. doi: 10.1177/1065912921989442.
M. F. Arroyabe, M. Schumann, and C. F. A. Arranz, “Mapping the entrepreneurial university literature: a text mining approach,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 955–963, 2022, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2022.2055318.
D. B. Audretsch and M. Belitski, “A strategic alignment framework for the entrepreneurial university,” Ind. Innov., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 285–309, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13662716.2021.1941799.
H. E. Co?kun, C. Popescu, D. ?ahin Samaraz, A. Tabak, and B. Akkaya, “Entrepreneurial University Concept Review from the Perspective of Academicians: A Mixed Method Research Analysis,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 16, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141610110.
S. M. Salhieh and Y. Al-Abdallat, “Technopreneurial intentions: The effect of innate innovativeness and academic self-efficacy,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14010238.
N. W. Lubis, “Resource Based View ( RBV ) in Improving Company Strategic,” vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 587–596, 2022.
M. Gurwinder and K. Dua, “Analysis on institutional theory , mimetic isomorphism , and firm performance,” vol. 6, no. May, pp. 5821–5832, 2022.
M. Zou, P. Liu, X. Wu, W. Zhou, Y. Jin, and M. Xu, “Cognitive Characteristics of an Innovation Team and Collaborative Innovation Performance?: The Mediating Role of Cooperative Behavior and the Moderating Role of Team Innovation Efficacy,” 2023.
R. Mulyany et al., “A Potential Framework For an Impactful Technopreneurship Education,” Indones. J. Bus. Entrep., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 208–219, 2023, doi: 10.17358/ijbe.9.2.208.
K. Setiaji, S. Suratno, and W. Sakitri, “Strategic Transformation Towards an Entrepreneurial University: Developing A University-Based Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in Legal Entity Public University,” Sci. Law, vol. 2025, no. 3, pp. 207–217, 2025, doi: 10.55284/5arytv15.
D. B. Audretsch and M. Belitski, “Three-ring entrepreneurial university: in search of a new business model,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 977–987, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2021.1896804.
P. Comesaña-Comesaña, A. Amorós-Pons, and I. Alexeeva-Alexeev, “Technocreativity, Social Networks and Entrepreneurship: Diagnostics of Skills in University Students,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 180–195, 2022, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v17i05.28183.
F. M. AlQhtani, “Knowledge Management for Research Innovation in Universities for Sustainable Development: A Qualitative Approach,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 6, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17062481.
D. Politis, L. Aaboen, A. E. Eide, and D. H. Haneberg, “Re-viewing entrepreneurial universities through alumni engagement,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 655–671, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11187-023-00863-2.
Nanda Nur Rafiana, “Technopreneurship Strategy to Grow Entrepreneurship Career Options for Students in Higher Education,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 110–126, 2023, doi: 10.34306/ajri.v5i2.995.
W. L. Koe, M. H. Mahphoth, N. E. Alias, R. Krishnan, and A. F. Arham, “Factors influencing intention towards technopreneurship among university students,” J. Educ. Soc. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 162–169, 2021, doi: 10.36941/jesr-2021-0016.
C. Bridge, D. Horey, B. Loch, B. Julien, and B. Thompson, “The impact of an innovators group on the development of a culture of innovation in the use of educational technologies,” Australas. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 17–32, 2023, doi: 10.14742/ajet.8575.
K. Jose, C. Vera, J. Joab, A. Velita, T. A. Martinez, and R. M. Ferrer, “Determinant-Factors-of-Entrepreneurial-Culture-in-University-Students-An-Analysis-from-the-Theory-of-Planned-Behavior-at-a-Peruvian-University_2024_Multidisciplinary-Digital-Publishing-Institute-MDPI.pdf,” 2024.
O. Access, K. Gaurav, J. Mahato, and N. Sinha, “Technopreneurial Emergence: Unraveling Institutional Strategies of Higher Education Institutions A Case Study of National Institute of Technology Jamshedpur,” Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci., no. 01, 2024, doi: 10.56726/irjmets48428.
C. E. Mueller and I. Eckardt, “Effectiveness of targeted public university funding on universities’ start-up support: evidence from ‘EXIST—Potentials,’” Sci. Public Policy, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 963–977, 2024, doi: 10.1093/scipol/scae039.
N. Artyukhova, O. Churikanova, and K. Bliumska-Danko, “University Leadership: Transparency in Communication with External Stakeholders,” Bus. Ethics Leadersh., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 16–36, 2024, doi: 10.61093/bel.8(4).16-36.2024.
M. Lundqvist and K. Williams-Middleton, “Making the whole university entrepreneurial – decades of legitimacy-building through Chalmers School of Entrepreneurship,” Technovation, vol. 132, no. April 2023, p. 102993, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102993.
M. Liu, M. J. Gorgievski, J. Qi, and F. Paas, “Perceived university support and entrepreneurial intentions: Do different students benefit differently?,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 73, no. March, p. 101150, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101150.
A. L. Makai and T. Dory, “Perceived university support and environment as a factor of entrepreneurial intention: Evidence from Western Transdanubia Region,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 6 June, pp. 1–24, 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283850.
A. Chinnaraju, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling ( PLS-SEM ) in the AI Era?: Innovative methodological guide and framework for business research,” vol. 13, no. 02, pp. 62–108, 2025.
E. Badzi?ska, “The Entrepreneurial University: Conceptualisation, Models and Challenges for Operationalisation of the Concept,” Contemp. Organ. Manag. Challenges trends, vol. 39, pp. 443–459, 2020, doi: 10.18778/8220-333-2.28.
J. D. Linton and W. Xu, “education?: What needs to happen next??,” J. Technol. Transf., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 393–406, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09786-6
