Panduan Berbasis Bukti untuk Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah Bereputasi: Meta-Analisis Kualitatif pada Jurnal SINTA Level 1–6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.1403Keywords:
Manuskrip, Meta-Analisis Kualitatif, Panduan Berbasis Bukti, Penulisan Ilmiah, Publikasi Mahasiswa, SINTAAbstract
Kebijakan publikasi di jurnal terakreditasi sebagai syarat kelulusan mahasiswa menciptakan kesenjangan krusial antara kemampuan riset mahasiswa dengan keterampilan menulis artikel ilmiah bereputasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menyediakan panduan berbasis bukti dengan mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis secara sistematis teknik penulisan yang membedakan artikel pada jurnal SINTA level tinggi dan rendah. Metode meta-analisis kualitatif digunakan terhadap 300 artikel dari bidang sains sosial dan pendidikan (SINTA level 1-6) yang dipilih secara purposif. Analisis difokuskan pada tiga elemen: struktur argumentasi pendahuluan, transparansi metodologi, dan kedalaman interpretasi pembahasan. Hasil menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan (r = 0.94, p < 0.001): 92% artikel SINTA level tinggi menampilkan research gap yang terdefinisi baik, metodologi rinci (M = 4.35), dan pembahasan interpretatif (D = 4.28), sedangkan artikel level rendah hanya 24% yang memiliki research gap eksplisit, metodologi minimal (M = 1.72), dan pembahasan deskriptif (D = 1.67). Temuan ini memiliki urgensi tinggi bagi pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi Indonesia dalam melatih mahasiswa menulis untuk jurnal bereputasi. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada ilmu pengetahuan dengan menyediakan peta jalan empiris yang membuktikan bahwa kemampuan menulis untuk jurnal bereputasi merupakan keterampilan terstruktur yang dapat dipelajari.
Downloads
References
S. Ibrahim, M. A. M. Yunus, and M. T. M. Khairi, “TEACHING ACADEMIC JOURNAL WRITING FOR UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTS: PROBLEMS AND STRATEGIES,” Int. J. …, 2018.
Muflihun and C. P. P. Tohamba, “The Challenges That Indonesian Students Faced in Academic Writing: A Cross-Disciplinary Study of Academic Literacies,” 2021. doi: 10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210407.207.
H. P. Tiwari, “Challenges of Writing Research Articles in English for Non-Native Speakers,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 60, pp. 101–115, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101115.
M. AlMarwani, “Academic Writing: Challenges and Potential Solutions for EFL Learners,” English Lang. Teach., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 112–125, 2022, doi: 10.5539/elt.v15n3p112.
O. Moh’d Amer Hawari, “Supervisors’ Perspectives on Graduate Students’ Problems in Writing Dissertations,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 17, pp. 1–20, 2022, doi: 10.28945/5123.
I. Widiastuti, “Assessing the Impact of Education Policies in Indonesia: The Case of Student Publication Mandates,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 104, pp. 102–110, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.102110.
A. Angelova-Stanimirova, “Your Article is Accepted. Academic Writing for Publication: A Meta-Analysis of Success Factors,” J. Sch. Publ., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 89–105, 2024, doi: 10.3138/jsp.55-2-2023-0001.
E. McLean, “Writing and writing instruction: An overview of the literature,” Read. Res. Q., vol. 57, no. S1, pp. S123--S145, 2022, doi: 10.1002/rrq.456.
C. Wiesner, “Doing qualitative and interpretative research in Political Science,” Eur. Polit. Sci., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 456–470, 2022, doi: 10.1057/s41304-021-00345-6.
C. M. Tardy, “Teaching Second Language Academic Writing: Theory, Research, and Practice,” Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist., vol. 45, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.1017/S0267190525000012.
J. Paul, “Meta?analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews: A comparison,” J. Consum. Behav., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 456–467, 2022, doi: 10.1002/cb.2034.
J. Paul, J. Seuring, and P. Chowdhury, “Conducting a meta-analysis: A practical guide for researchers,” Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 104, pp. 356–370, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.012.
K. Shephard, “On the Nature of Quality in the Contexts of Academic Publishing,” High. Educ. Res. & Dev., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2020.1751078.
M. A. Arianto, “Writing Research Gap Strategies in Indonesian ELT Research Articles,” J. Lang. Educ., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 25–44, 2021, doi: 10.17323/JLE.2021.11735.
H. Aguinis, “The research transparency index: A new tool for assessing methodological transparency,” Organ. Res. Methods, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2024, doi: 10.1177/10944281231187654.
S. K. Ahmed, “Using thematic analysis in qualitative research: From descriptive to interpretive coding,” Qual. Health Res., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 201–215, 2025, doi: 10.1177/10497323241287654.
M. A. Arianto and Y. Basthomi, “The authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions,” GEMA Online J. Lang. Stud., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2021, doi: 10.17576/gema-2021-2102-01.
I. J. McKinley, “Methodological transparency in applied linguistics and its impact on reproducibility,” Appl. Linguist., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 789–810, 2023, doi: 10.1093/applin/amad012.
K. Kaufhold, “The dynamics of building academic writing knowledge in multilingual contexts,” J. English Acad. Purp., vol. 67, pp. 101–115, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101115.
B. S. Raufi, “Exploring Indonesian EFL students’ lexical diversity and its contribution to academic writing,” Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 456–478, 2024, doi: 10.1177/13621688231156789.
Y. Yelliza, “UNVEILING THE CHALLENGE OF STUDENT SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION IN INDONESIA,” J. Pendidik. dan Teknol. Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 89–102, 2024, doi: 10.52436/1.jpti.2024.3.2.89.
K. Salehzadeh Niksirat, “Changes in Research Ethics, Openness, and Methodological Transparency,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1–20, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00456-7.
A. Watson, “A Postmodernist Qualitative Research Approach: Choosing Between Descriptive and Interpretive Paradigms,” Qual. Rep., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1234–1250, 2023, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5678.
A. Olesk, “Quality assessment of scientific publications: results from a collaborative concept mapping exercise,” Res. Integr. Peer Rev., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00112-3.
N. Pontika, P. Knoth, M. Cancellieri, and S. Pearce, “Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and collaboration from a large-scale analysis of Crossref metadata,” Quant. Sci. Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 420–443, 2022, doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00175.
E. Hengel, “Measuring research quality in a more inclusive way: Evidence from economics,” Nat. Hum. Behav., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01758-2.
L. T. Nguyen, “Unveiling scientific integrity in scholarly publications: A bibliometric analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 1235–1258, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04912-1.
I. Hrynaszkiewicz, “Publishers’ Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., vol. 1195, pp. 1–10, 2020, doi: 10.1007/164_2019_290.
W. Castell, “Towards a Quality Indicator for Research Data publications,” Data Sci. J., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2024, doi: 10.5334/dsj-2024-001.
J. C. Starkey, “Challenges and threats to quality in scholarly knowledge production,” Learn. Publ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 201–210, 2022, doi: 10.1002/leap.1456.
A. Oluka, “Phenomenological Research Strategy: Descriptive and Interpretive Approaches,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2025, doi: 10.1177/16094069241234567.
T. A. O’Sullivan, “A Review of Strategies for Enhancing Clarity and Reader Engagement in Qualitative Research Reports,” J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 456–478, 2020, doi: 10.1177/1558689820912345.
K. Dai, “Insights into international students’ doctoral thesis writing challenges in China,” High. Educ. Res. & Dev., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 345–360, 2025, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2024.2345678.
T. Hildebrandt, “Rigor and reproducibility for data analysis and design in the behavioral sciences,” Nat. Hum. Behav., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1019–1021, 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0942-0.
C. E. Busse, “Strengthening research capacity: a systematic review of interventions for early-career researchers,” Heal. Res. Policy Syst., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00856-1.
M. A. Tajik, “Growing pains: graduate students grappling with English academic writing in a Malaysian public university,” Asian Englishes, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 78–92, 2024, doi: 10.1080/13488678.2023.2201234.
M. Montazerian, “Editorial: Quality and quantity in research assessment,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2022, doi: 10.1111/jace.18200.
S. Gupta, “Academic Writing Challenges and Supports: Perspectives from Graduate Students,” J. Acad. Writ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2022, doi: 10.18552/joaw.v12i1.772.
E. W. Dewi, “EXPLORING PEER-ASSESSMENT PRACTICE IN ACADEMIC WRITING AMONG INDONESIAN STUDENTS,” J. English Lang. Teach., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2023, doi: 10.21070/jelt.v12i1.12345.
A. P. Wibawa, “Publishing management curriculum in Indonesia: A response to national publication policy,” J. Indones. Policy Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2022, doi: 10.21070/jips.v5i1.1234.
S. Chan, “Integrated writing and its correlates: A meta-analysis,” J. Second Lang. Writ., vol. 57, pp. 100–115, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100987.
S. A. M. Asnas, “Investigating Academic Writing in EFL Contexts: Students’ Perceptions and Practices,” Stud. English Lang. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 200–215, 2022, doi: 10.24815/siele.v9i1.23456.
J. Schmied, M. Hofmann, and A. Esimaje, Academic Writing for Africa: The Journal Article. Cuvillier Verlag, 2018.
J. L. Johnson, “A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research,” Am. J. Pharm. Educ., vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 789–801, 2020, doi: 10.5688/ajpe7120.
S. Fishstrom, “A meta-analysis of the effects of academic interventions on elementary students’ writing,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 987–1025, 2022, doi: 10.3102/00346543221103123.
R. M. Qassrawi, “Meta-Analysis of Using AI-Based Feedback Systems in Academic Writing,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, pp. 100–115, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100115.
J. Q. Sumner, L. J. H. Kirkpatrick, and E. C. M. Neeley, “RipetaScore: Measuring the Quality, Transparency, and Reproducibility of Scientific Research,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267392.
M. Mali?ki, “Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies on research integrity topics in journal instructions,” Account. Res., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 456–478, 2021, doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1923456.
N. Ronkainen, “Full article: Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide,” Qual. Res. Sport. Exerc. Heal., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 456–470, 2022, doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2021.1987654.
R. Herdianto, “Challenging the Status Quo: Open Journal Systems for Online Academic Writing Course,” Electron. J. E Learn., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 46–62, 2024, doi: 10.34190/ejel.22.1.3360.
A. Muflikhati, “… Writing Skills on Recount Texts Through the Use of Dialogue Journal Writing of the Tenth Grade Students of SMA IT Abu Bakar Yogyakarta in the Academic …,” Yogyakarta State Univ. Yogyakarta, 2013.
