pada, di Faktor Penentu Niat Menggunakan PRV (Pesantren Ramadhan Virtual): Evaluasi TAM Berbasis PLS-SEM pada Siswa SMK Muhammadiyah Campaka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.1400Kata Kunci:
Metode Campuran, Muhammadiyah, Pendidikan Islam, Pendidikan Vokasi, Penerimaan Teknologi, Pesantren Ramadhan VirtualAbstrak
Integrasi teknologi digital memegang peranan krusial untuk menjaga relevansi pendidikan berbasis agama di era modern. Akan tetapi, penelitian empiris yang mengkaji penerimaan teknologi dalam konteks unik yang memadukan pendidikan vokasi, keagamaan, dan pembelajaran hibrida di Indonesia masih terbatas, sehingga menciptakan kesenjangan pengetahuan yang signifikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengisi kesenjangan tersebut dengan mengevaluasi faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi niat siswa menggunakan Pesantren Ramadhan Virtual (PRV), sebuah platform pembelajaran hibrida di SMK Muhammadiyah Campaka. Berlandaskan kerangka Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dan desain metode campuran sekuensial eksplanatori, penelitian ini menganalisis data survei kuantitatif dari 68 siswa menggunakan Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), yang kemudian diperdalam dengan analisis tematik pada umpan balik kualitatif. Hasil analisis kuantitatif menunjukkan bahwa Persepsi Kegunaan (Perceived Usefulness) menjadi prediktor terkuat terhadap Niat Perilaku (Behavioral Intention) , sementara Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan (Perceived Ease of Use) berpengaruh sangat signifikan terhadap Persepsi Kegunaan . Temuan kualitatif memberikan konteks pada hasil kuantitatif tersebut dengan menyoroti tiga area utama perbaikan platform: Kinerja Teknis, Kedalaman Konten, dan Fitur Interaktif. Studi ini menawarkan kebaruan dengan memvalidasi TAM dalam konteks spesifik ini dan menyimpulkan bahwa meskipun nilai inti platform telah diakui, pengalaman pengguna (user experience) masih membutuhkan peningkatan teknis yang signifikan untuk mendorong adopsi yang lebih luas dan berkelanjutan.
Unduhan
Referensi
“Technical and Vocational Education and Training System Reform (TSR 2.0) GIZ Office Indonesia,” 2021. [Online]. Available: www.bmz.de
N. Rafifing, J. Mosinki, A. Mabina, B. E. Otlhomile, and O. Mphole, “Usability of Mobile Learning Technologies in Open and Distance Learning,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 138–157, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v7i1.989.
A. Retno Pratiwi and N. Sri Lengkanawati, “CHALLENGES OF ONLINE TEACHING IN RURAL AREA: WHAT HAVE THEY LEARNED FOR TEACHER DEVELOPMENT?,” vol. 7, no. 2, 2023, Accessed: Aug. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/tlemc/article/download/5993/3140
M. A. Ramadhan and D. Daryati, “Online learning innovation at vocational schools in Indonesia during Covid-19 pandemic: A literatur review,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc., Jun. 2022. doi: 10.1063/5.0094284.
I. Febrian Kristiana, U. Prihatsanti, E. Simanjuntak, and G. Widayanti, “Online Student Engagement: The Overview of HE in Indonesia,” 2023.
W. M. Wijaya, L. S. Syarifah, and T. David, “Enhancing E-Learning in Vocational Schools: Key Characteristics of Instructional Design,” Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 68–78, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.21831/jamp.v12i1.75984.
M. S. Rosli, N. S. Saleh, A. Md. Ali, S. Abu Bakar, and L. Mohd Tahir, “A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model for the Sustainability of Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Identified Research Gaps,” Sep. 01, 2022, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/su141811389.
Nijo, Erwin, Muhammad Shalahuddin Al Awwaby, and Rofi Wirawan, “Adaptation of islamic religious education learning through digital technology for grade 12 students at smk muhamdiyah sintang,” At Turots: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, pp. 616–628, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.51468/jpi.v6i2.766.
Persyarikatan Muhammadiyah, “Islamic Values Meet Technology: Muhammadiyah Approach to Education in the Digital Age,” https://en.muhammadiyah.or.id/islamic-values-meet-technology-muhammadiyah-approach-to-education-in-the-digital-age/.
K. Saleh, I. Rukiyah, M. A. Universitas, B. Tarakan, and K. Utara, “Blended Learning as a Developmental Model Strategy of Teaching and Learning in Islamic Universities in Indonesia,” DINAMIKA ILMU, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.21093/di.v21i1.3809.
H. Idris, R. Adawiyah, and N. K. Afandi, “Online Learning Model Implemented in Islamic Education in Post Covid-19 Pandemic: Case of Multicultural Students in Indonesia,” Dinamika Ilmu, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 217–229, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.21093/di.v23i2.6376.
E. Ansyah, “The Role of Digital Learning in Islamic Education: An Analysis of Acceptance Technology In Indonesia,” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 2022, no. 102, pp. 21–38, 2022, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2022.102.002.
S. L. Ramadhani, A. P. Widodo, and D. M. K. Nugraheni, “Comparative Study of Technology Acceptance Models for Academic Information Systems: A Theoretical Review,” International Journal of Mathematics And Computer Research, vol. 13, no. 10, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.47191/ijmcr/v13i10.01.
M. Tukiran, W. Sunaryo, D. Wulandari, and Herfina, “Optimizing Education Processes During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using the Technology Acceptance Model,” Front Educ (Lausanne), vol. 7, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.903572.
B. M. Izzati, S. S. Adzra, and M. Saputra, “Online Learning Acceptance in Higher Education during Covid-19 Pandemic: An Indonesian Case Study,” International Journal of Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 207–218, 2024, doi: 10.14716/ijtech.v15i1.5078.
N. Nuryakin, N. L. P. Rakotoarizaka, and H. G. Musa, “The Effect of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Easy to Use on Student Satisfaction The Mediating Role of Attitude to Use Online Learning,” Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, vol. 011, no. 03, pp. 323–336, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.21776/ub.apmba.2023.011.03.5.
X. Wu, W. Wider, L. S. Wong, C. K. Chan, and S. S. Maidin, “Integrating the technology acceptance model on online learning effectiveness of emerging adult learners in Guangzhou, China,” International Journal of Education and Practice, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 129–140, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.18488/61.v11i2.3282.
H. S. Siregar, “PERCEIVED USEFULNESS AND PERCEIVED EASE OF USE OF ONLINE LEARNING FOR ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION TEACHER,” Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 93–106, 2023, doi: 10.15575/jpi.v0i0.25518.
S. Asiyah, C. W. Budiyanto, and A. G. Tamrin, “Technology Acceptance Model in the Analysis of the Influence Of E-Learning Implementation to Students’ Motivation,” IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education), vol. 2, no. 1, p. 51, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.20961/ijie.v2i1.14496.
J. A. Habibullah, I. Norvaizi, and D. E. C. Dewi, “Implementasi Mixed Methods dalam Penelitian Pendidikan,” Peradaban Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–31, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.59001/pjier.v3i1.245.
Sofyan and I. Khalik, “SEQUENTIAL EXPLANATORY ANALYSIS OF SCHOOL SUPERVISORS PERFORMANCE REVIEWED FROM ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND WORK MOTIVATION,” Scientific Journals of Economic Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53–64, Apr. 2019.
PENDIDIKAN GURU PENDIDIKAN ANAK USIA DINI, “Metodologi Mixed Method: Pengertian, Jenis, Contoh, dan Sistematikanya,” Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
J. W. Creswell and V. L. P. Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research, Third Edition. SAGE, 2018.
N. Kalpokas and J. Hecker, “The Guide to Mixed Methods Research,” ATLAS.ti Research Hub.
K. Royce, “Mixed Methods,” in Education Research Across Multiple Paradigms, pp. 118–125. Accessed: Aug. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://new.edtechbooks.org/education_research/mixed_methods
S. Dawadi, S. Shrestha, and R. A. Giri, “Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms,” Journal of Practical Studies in Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 25–36, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20.
S. Sternad Zabukovšek, S. Bobek, U. Zabukovšek, Z. Kalini?, and P. Tominc, “Enhancing PLS-SEM-Enabled Research with ANN and IPMA: Research Study of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems’ Acceptance Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 9, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/math10091379.
P. Nguyen Thi Ha, H. Tran Van, P. Le Thai, T. Trinh Thi Phuong, and T. Tran, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in Higher Education Research: An Evidence from Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT),” New Review of Information Networking, vol. 29, no. 1–2, pp. 24–54, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1080/13614576.2025.2499748.
D. R. Rahadi, Pengatar Partial Least Square Structural Equation Model PLS-SEM, 1st ed. Tasikmalaya: CV. LENTERA ILMU MADANI, 2023. Accessed: Oct. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372827232_PENGANTAR_PARTIAL_LEAST_SQUARES_STRUCTURAL_EQUATION_MODELPLS-SEM_2023
S. M. Mulyono, W. A. Syafei, and R. Kusumaningrum, “Partial Least Square Algorithm (PLS) with Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in User Analysis of Public Health Center Management Information System (SIMPUS) Applications,” Scientific Journal of Informatics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 199–204, May 2023, doi: 10.15294/sji.v10i2.44148.
I. S. Latif, R. E. Saputro, and A. S. Barkah, “Improvement of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with PLS-SEM: A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1376–1399, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v7i2.1104.
C. Jhantasana, “Should A Rule of Thumb be used to Calculate PLS-SEM Sample Size,” Asia Social Issues, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1–23, Apr. 2023, [Online]. Available: https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/asi
P. G. Subhaktiyasa, “PLS-SEM for Multivariate Analysis: A Practical Guide to Educational Research using SmartPLS,” EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 353–365, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.35877/454ri.eduline2861.
J. F. Hair, M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, P. N. Sharma, and B. D. Liengaard, “Going beyond the untold facts in PLS–SEM and moving forward,” Eur J Mark, vol. 58, no. 13, pp. 81–106, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1108/EJM-08-2023-0645.
C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker, “SmartPLS 4,” 2024, Bönningstedt: SmartPLS: 4.1.1.4. Accessed: Jun. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.smartpls.com
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual Res Psychol, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
I. Gemiharto and H. E. N. Priyadarshani, “The Challenges of the Digital Divide in the Online Learning Process During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia,” Ilomata International Journal of Management, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 343–356, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.52728/ijjm.v3i1.426.
H. Pratiwi and J. Priyana, “Exploring Student Engagement in Online Learning,” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 66, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.17977/um048v28i2p66-82.
Persyarikatan Muhammadiyah, “Muhammadiyah’s Digital Literacy Potential,” https://en.muhammadiyah.or.id/muhammadiyahs-digital-literacy-potential/, Yogyakarta, 2025.
