Integrasi ChatGPT Sebagai Asisten Virtual Untuk Meningkatkan Efektivitas Pembelajaran Pemrograman Web Berbasis Project Based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.1373Kata Kunci:
ChatGPT, Pemrograman Web, Project-Based Learning, Technology Acceptance ModelAbstrak
Metode pengajaran konvensional sering kali menekankan aktivitas yang berpusat pada pengajar, sehingga membatasi mahasiswa untuk mengembangkan keterampilan professional dan keterampilan interpersonal. Kesenjangan antara pengetahuan akademik dan kesiapan kerja ini menyoroti perlunya pendekatan inovatif dalam pendidikan. Project-Based Learning (PjBL) dipandang sebagai salah satu pendekatan pembelajaran yang relevan dan efektif dalam konteks pendidikan abad ke-21. Dalam penerapannya, perbedaan kemampuan awal mahasiswa sering menimbulkan ketimpangan pada hasil belajar. Penelitian mengeksplorasi integrasi ChatGPT ke dalam project-based learning (PjBL) pada mata kuliah Pemrograman Web serta menganalisis efektivitasnya terhadap hasil belajar dan penerimaan teknologi berdasarkan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) yang dimodifikasi dengan variabel self-efficacy. Penelitian ini melibatkan 71 mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi semester dua, yang dibagi ke dalam kelompok beranggotakan empat orang dengan peran yang spesifik. Lulusan SMK RPL ditempatkan secara merata di setiap kelompok untuk mendukung kolaborasi. Data diperoleh melalui pre-test, post-test, dan kuesioner TAM. Hasil menunjukkan adanya peningkatan hasil belajar setelah penerapan ChatGPT dalam PjBL, nilai post-test mahasiswa lulusan non-RPL meningkat hingga mendekati mahasiswa lulusan RPL. Selain itu, analisis TAM menunjukkan self-efficacy berpengaruh terhadap persepsi kemudahan dan kegunaan, yang membentuk sikap positif serta niat penggunaan ChatGPT. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam memperluas pemahaman mengenai integrasi kecerdasan buatan dalam PjBL serta faktor psikologis yang memengaruhi penerimaan teknologi di pendidikan tinggi.
Unduhan
Referensi
A. Jalil and Y. Shobrun, “Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek: Tinjauan Filosofi Pembelajaran Abad 21,” Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 4, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.47650/elips.v4i1.918
P. Guo, N. Saab, L. S. Post, and W. Admiraal, “A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures,” Int J Educ Res, vol. 102, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586.
J. Macías-Guarasa, J. M. Montero, R. San-Segundo, Á. Araujo, and O. Nieto-Taladriz, “A project-based learning approach to design Electronic Systems Curricula,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 49, no. 3, 2006, doi: 10.1109/TE.2006.879784.
C. Gupta, “The Impact and Measurement of Today’s Learning Technologies in Teaching Software Engineering Course Using Design-Based Learning and Project-Based Learning,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 65, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TE.2022.3169532.
E. Ceh-Varela, C. Canto-Bonilla, and D. Duni, “Application of Project-Based Learning to a Software Engineering course in a hybrid class environment,” Inf Softw Technol, vol. 158, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107189.
B. Ma, L. Chen, and S. Konomi, “Enhancing Programming Education with ChatGPT: A Case Study on Student Perceptions and Interactions in a Python Course,” Apr. 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.15472
S. Hwang, Y. Kim, and H. Lee, “ChatGPT and Its Educational Impact: Insights from a Software Development Competition,” Aug. 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.03779
D. Lee, Y. Huh, C. Y. Lin, C. M. Reigeluth, and E. Lee, “Differences in personalized learning practice and technology use in high- and low-performing learner-centered schools in the United States,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 69, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11423-021-09937-y.
T. Rasul et al., “The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions,” Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29.
S. Gomez-Jaramillo, O. Cardona-Zapata, M. Valbuena-Henao, and V. Poliche, “Guided Learning with AI: A Didactic Strategy Using Sequential Tutoring via ChatGPT for Object-Oriented Programming,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 717–736, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.24.7.35.
M. M. Amin, E. Cambria, and B. W. Schuller, “Will Affective Computing Emerge From Foundation Models and General Artificial Intelligence? A First Evaluation of ChatGPT,” IEEE Intell Syst, vol. 38, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1109/MIS.2023.3254179.
X. Pan, “Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator,” Front Psychol, vol. 11, 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294.
A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychol Rev, vol. 84, no. 2, 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
A. Mojavezi and M. P. Tamiz, “The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students’ motivation and achievement,” Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, 2012, doi: 10.4304/tpls.2.3.483-491.
F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Q, vol. 13, no. 3, 1989, doi: 10.2307/249008.
M. A. Jaber, A. Beganovi?, A. A. Almisreb, and A. Info, “Methods and Applications of ChatGPT in Software Development: A Literature Review,” Southeast Europe Journal of Soft Computing, vol. 12, no. 1, 2023.
M. M. Rahman and Y. Watanobe, “ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 9, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13095783.
D. Sun, A. Boudouaia, C. Zhu, and Y. Li, “Would ChatGPT-facilitated programming mode impact college students’ programming behaviors, performances, and perceptions? An empirical study,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00446-5.
M. M. Rahman and Y. Watanobe, “ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 9, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13095783.
S. Biswas, “Role of ChatGPT in Computer Programming.,” Mesopotamian Journal of Computer Science, 2022, doi: 10.58496/mjcsc/2022/004.
N. Nathalia, A. Paulo, and C. Donald, “Artificial Intelligence vs. Software Engineers: An Empirical Study on Performance and Efficiency using ChatGPT,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2023.
Y. Li and X. Wang, “Application of Artificial Intelligence and Visual Programming Technologies in Digital Interactive Project Development,” in 2023 4th International Conference on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence and Software Engineering, ICBASE 2023, 2023. doi: 10.1109/ICBASE59196.2023.10303142.
R. Yilmaz and F. G. Karaoglan Yilmaz, “The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147.
T. W. Kim, “Application of artificial intelligence chatbots, including ChatGPT, in education, scholarly work, programming, and content generation and its prospects: a narrative review,” 2023. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.38.
